Why does a services client care that TechSteps builds products?

Because it changes what our recommendations are based on. Building and running SecAI and StackAttest forces us to make the same decisions we advise clients on, then live with the consequences: how an agent behaves on a server we do not control, what an automated response is allowed to do without a human, how to keep an update channel trustworthy, and what evidence is worth collecting. That experience is the reason our infrastructure and security advice is specific rather than generic.

Our products

Cybersecurity product

SecAI

AI-powered Linux server security for organizations that need continuous monitoring, automated response and practical compliance evidence without building a full security operations team.

What building it proves

  • Linux engineering at the host level. A monitoring agent has to be small, safe under load and honest about what it cannot see.
  • Systems programming discipline. The agent is written in Rust and ships as a signed binary, because an update channel into customer servers is a supply chain.
  • Automation with a boundary. Blocking a hostile IP can be automatic. Restarting a service, rotating credentials or changing accounts should not be.
  • Compliance as an output, not a product. Reporting aligned to UAE NESA and PDPL only means something if the underlying evidence is real.
Software assurance product

StackAttest

Standards-mapped software validation that turns technical evidence into a Passport a founder controls. It shows what was actually tested instead of relying on a vague claim that an application is ready.

What building it proves

  • Evidence architecture. Collecting signals from a live application, its source, its dependency graph and an isolated runtime, then keeping them attributable.
  • Standards literacy. Mapping findings to named frameworks rather than inventing a private scoring system nobody can audit.
  • Honest scoring. The deterministic score is separated from model review, so consensus never quietly moves the number.
  • Knowing what a claim is worth. Technical validation is not an organizational audit, and the product says so.

Independent record

You do not have to take our word for any of this.

SecAI holds a public StackAttest Passport. It records the evidence behind each verified capability and the level reached. We link to it rather than reprinting a summary, because a claim you can check is worth more than one you cannot.

StackAttest tests software directly. It complements an organizational audit such as SOC 2 and does not replace one.

Open the SecAI Passport (opens in a new tab)
Verification level
L4 Production Validated
Evidence coverage
92%
Validation confidence
85%
AI consensus
85%
Source
StackAttest public Passport, validated 28 August 2026

Want that applied to your system?

The engineering behind these products is the same engineering we bring to client work. Tell us what you are building or operating.